Enhancing Liquefaction Hazard Forecasting on Regional Scale

Authors

  • George Papathanassiou School of Geology, Aristotle Univesrity of Thessaloniki, Greece Author
  • Sotiris Valkaniotis School of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Author
  • Maria Taftsoglou Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Italy Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64862/ajeg.2025.2sp.26.122

Keywords:

Geomorphology, Liquefaction, Failures

Abstract

Soil liquefaction is an earthquake-induced phenomenon that is frequently reported on alluvial plains and coastal areas. Though the fact that liquefaction is considered as a low-level hazard compared to other relevant coseismic phenomena, can cause severe damage to lifelines, critical facilities and other structures constructed upon loose and saturated Quaternary deposits. Today, two approaches are followed for assessing liquefaction susceptibility and hazard of a site: the local scale and the regional one. The former is based on in-situ tests conducted on the selected site, while the latter is based on qualitative criteria combined by considering post-earthquake reports and the spatial distribution of geological features. This study investigated the correlation between geological/geomorphological features and the density of liquefaction occurrences aiming to propose a new quantitative classification of liquefaction potential of geomorphological features. As an outcome, it was clearly shown that the deposits of the inner part of meanders, characterized as point bar formations, are characterized by the highest weight values followed by the areas mapped as abandoned river channels.

References

Bastin, S., Quigley, M., and Bassett, K. (2015). Paleoliquefaction in eastern Christchurch, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 127(9–10), 1348–1365. https://doi.org/10.1130/B31174.1

Papathanassiou, G., Mantovani, A., Tarabusi, G., Rapti, D., and Caputo, R. (2015). Assessment of liquefaction potential for two liquefaction-prone areas considering the May 20, 2012, Emilia (Italy) earthquake. Engineering Geology, 189, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.02.002

Papathanassiou, G., Valkaniotis, S., Ganas, A., Stampolidis, A., Rapti, D., and Caputo, R. (2022). Floodplain evolution and its influence on liquefaction clustering: The case study of March 2021 Thessaly, Greece, seismic sequence. Engineering Geology, 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106542

Taftsoglou, M., Valkaniotis, S., Papathanassiou, G., and Karantanellis, E. (2023). Satellite imagery for rapid detection of liquefaction surface manifestations: The case study of Türkiye–Syria 2023 earthquakes. Remote Sensing, 15(17), 4190. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174190

Taftsoglou, M. (2025). Assessment and management of critical infrastructure exposed to geohazards (Doctoral dissertation). Democritus University of Thrace, Greece.

Valkaniotis, S., Rapti, D., Taftsoglou, M., Papathanassiou, G., and Caputo, R. (2024). Geomorphological mapping for liquefaction likelihood: The Piniada Valley case study (central Greece). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 22, 5451–5474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01993-y

Wotherspoon, L., Pender, M., and Orense, R. P. (2012). Relationship between observed liquefaction at Kaiapoi following the 2010 Darfield earthquake and former channels of the Waimakariri River. Engineering Geology, 125, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.11.001

Downloads

Published

2025-11-27

How to Cite

Enhancing Liquefaction Hazard Forecasting on Regional Scale. (2025). Asian Journal of Engineering Geology, 2(Sp Issue), 55-56. https://doi.org/10.64862/ajeg.2025.2sp.26.122

Similar Articles

31-40 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.